Olaf Kirch wrote: > On Tuesday 03 November 2009 10:13:27 Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> I don't understand the reasoning behind .vs_hidden for NFS_ACL, hopefully >> Olaf can clarify. NFS_ACL is the only user of .vs_hidden as far as I can >> see though, so if this is changeg, shouldn't the entire commit bc5fea4 >> which introduced the flag be reverted? > > I can't remember the details of that one. I do remember that this is > based on someone's request who told me that we shouldn't register nfsacl > with portmap. I didn't check myself whether Solaris did or did not do > it at that time. > > I have no issue with reverting that change, and removing the whole > .vs_hidden kludge too. > It seems that vs_hidden is used in 1 place outside of the NFS_ACL server code. It is used in the NFSv4 callback code. I will look to see how difficult that might be to fix this spot as well and then get rid of vs_hidden. Thanx... ps -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
