On Tuesday 03 November 2009 10:13:27 Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > I don't understand the reasoning behind .vs_hidden for NFS_ACL, hopefully > Olaf can clarify. NFS_ACL is the only user of .vs_hidden as far as I can > see though, so if this is changeg, shouldn't the entire commit bc5fea4 > which introduced the flag be reverted? I can't remember the details of that one. I do remember that this is based on someone's request who told me that we shouldn't register nfsacl with portmap. I didn't check myself whether Solaris did or did not do it at that time. I have no issue with reverting that change, and removing the whole .vs_hidden kludge too. Thanks, Olaf -- Neo didn't bring down the Matrix. SOA did. (soafacts.com) -------------------------------------------- Olaf Kirch - Director Server (okir@xxxxxxxxxx) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
