On 09/09/2009 01:31 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:51 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> On 09/02/2009 09:51 AM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> Sorry for the repost. After reading the patch descriptions again, I >>> thought they needed some clarification. >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Chuck Lever (4): >>> NFS: Allow the "nfs" file system type to support NFSv4 >>> NFS: Move details of nfs4_get_sb() to a helper >>> NFS: Refactor NFSv4 text-based mount option validation >>> NFS: Mount option parser should detect missing "port=" >>> >>> >>> fs/nfs/internal.h | 10 ++ >>> fs/nfs/super.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >>> include/linux/nfs4.h | 1 These patches (after a bit of back porting) are now in the F-12 and Rawhide kernels, >>> 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) >>> >> Trond, >> >> I'm updating the mount.nfs man pages, and would like give >> an guess-ta-mate as to which kernel these patches will be in. >> Any ideas? > > I'm planning on pushing them out in the upcoming merge window, since the > patches themselves seem pretty straightforward. I've applied the fixes > that I suggested, and added the patch to disable vers!=4 in the '-t > nfs4' case. > > If you'd like to test it all out, I've pushed those patches into the > nfs-for-2.6.32 branch of my git tree. They should also appear in > linux-next. After a weekend of testing these patches along with Chunk's mount.nfs patches, I committed these patches (after some back porting) to both the Fedora F-12 and Rawhide kernels, which means they will get plenty of testing by the time 2.6.32 rolls around... steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
