On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:51 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > On 09/02/2009 09:51 AM, Chuck Lever wrote: > > Sorry for the repost. After reading the patch descriptions again, I > > thought they needed some clarification. > > > > --- > > > > Chuck Lever (4): > > NFS: Allow the "nfs" file system type to support NFSv4 > > NFS: Move details of nfs4_get_sb() to a helper > > NFS: Refactor NFSv4 text-based mount option validation > > NFS: Mount option parser should detect missing "port=" > > > > > > fs/nfs/internal.h | 10 ++ > > fs/nfs/super.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > include/linux/nfs4.h | 1 > > 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) > > > Trond, > > I'm updating the mount.nfs man pages, and would like give > an guess-ta-mate as to which kernel these patches will be in. > Any ideas? I'm planning on pushing them out in the upcoming merge window, since the patches themselves seem pretty straightforward. I've applied the fixes that I suggested, and added the patch to disable vers!=4 in the '-t nfs4' case. If you'd like to test it all out, I've pushed those patches into the nfs-for-2.6.32 branch of my git tree. They should also appear in linux-next. Cheers Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
