On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Yes. The NFS client will cache mtime whether or not you do an 'ls'. I > suspect the only reason for the 'ls' in that launchpad bug report, is to > force an mtime update (and to fill the readdir cache). Ok, interesting. I guess though that 'something' needs to read at least a file in that particular directory for the directory content to be cached, right? (i.e. either an 'ls' or some create/delete of a file?) Cheers, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
