On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 12:10 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:51:02PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:47 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:40:36PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > 3c1bb23c037, first in 1.1.3, removes AUTH_NULL from that static > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > Does the server support auth_null security? I didn't think it did. > > > > > > Just off the top of my head, without looking at the code: I believe it > > > treats auth_null rpc calls exactly as if they were auth_sys calls with > > > uid and gid set to the "anonymous" uid and gid. > > > > OK, so that would break too. > > I've lost track of the antecedent to "that". Negotiating AUTH_NULL security for those mountd programs that fake up a list of flavours that excludes AUTH_NULL. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
