On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:15:22AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 15:11 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 11:00 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > >> > Sorry for the previous, stupid question. I applied the patch in > >> > addition the last one and here are the results: > >> > > >> > 70327 > >> > 71561 > >> > 68760 > >> > 69199 > >> > 65324 > >> > > >> > A packet capture for this run is available here: > >> > http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/trond2.pcap.bz2 > >> > > >> > Any more ideas? ;) > >> > >> Yep. I've got 2 more patches for you. With both of them applied, I'm > >> seeing decent performance on my own test rig. The first patch is > >> appended. I'll send the second in another email (to avoid attachments). > > > > Here is number 2. It is incremental to all the others... > > With all 4 patches applied, these are the numbers for 5 runs: > > 103168 > 101212 > 103346 > 100842 > 103172 > > It's looking much better, but we're still off by a few percent. Thanks > for the quick turnaround on this, Trond! If you submit these patches, > feel free to add: I'd like to take a look and run some tests of my own when I get back from vacation next week. Then assuming no problems I'm inclined to queue them up for 2.6.31, and, in the meantime, revert the autotuning patch temporarily for 2.6.30--under the assumption that autotuning is still the right thing to do, but that this is too significant a regression to ignore, and Trond's work is too involved to submit for 2.6.30 this late in the process. --b. > > Tested-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cheers, > Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
