Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 15:11 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 11:00 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> > Sorry for the previous, stupid question. I applied the patch in >> > addition the last one and here are the results: >> > >> > 70327 >> > 71561 >> > 68760 >> > 69199 >> > 65324 >> > >> > A packet capture for this run is available here: >> > http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/trond2.pcap.bz2 >> > >> > Any more ideas? ;) >> >> Yep. I've got 2 more patches for you. With both of them applied, I'm >> seeing decent performance on my own test rig. The first patch is >> appended. I'll send the second in another email (to avoid attachments). > > Here is number 2. It is incremental to all the others... With all 4 patches applied, these are the numbers for 5 runs: 103168 101212 103346 100842 103172 It's looking much better, but we're still off by a few percent. Thanks for the quick turnaround on this, Trond! If you submit these patches, feel free to add: Tested-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
