On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:11:28PM -0700, Labiaga, Ricardo wrote: > It shouldn't be too bad. I'll go ahead and rework the patches on top of > your asynchronous RPC callback changes. OK, thanks. I've added them to for-2.6.31: git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-2.6.31 So easiest for me would be if the patches are against that. --b. > > - ricardo > > > On 5/3/09 1:53 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:00:22AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > >> Bruce, > >> > >> After squashing and merging Ricardo's latest patchset > >> please review the following patchset and consider for 2.6.31. > > > > Note this will conflict with the pending changes I have to make the > > current callbacks use asynchronous rpc tasks instead of > > kthreads--apologies. I'll try to get those into for-2.6.31 tomorrow, > > and then I hope you won't mind working on top of that? > > > > --b. > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Benny > >> > >> [RFC 01/10] nfsd: cleanup nfs4.0 callback encode routines > >> [RFC 02/10] nfsd: minorversion support for the back channel > >> [RFC 03/10] nfsd41: sunrpc: Added rpc server-side backchannel handling > >> [RFC 04/10] nfsd41: Remember the auth flavor to use for callbacks > >> [RFC 05/10] nfsd41: callback infrastructure > >> [RFC 06/10] nfsd41: Backchannel: Add sequence arguments to callback RPC > >> arguments > >> [RFC 07/10] nfsd41: Backchannel: Server backchannel RPC wait queue > >> [RFC 08/10] nfsd41: Backchannel: Setup sequence information > >> [RFC 09/10] nfsd41: cb_sequence callback > >> [RFC 10/10] nfsd41: cb_recall callback > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
