It shouldn't be too bad. I'll go ahead and rework the patches on top of your asynchronous RPC callback changes. - ricardo On 5/3/09 1:53 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:00:22AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: >> Bruce, >> >> After squashing and merging Ricardo's latest patchset >> please review the following patchset and consider for 2.6.31. > > Note this will conflict with the pending changes I have to make the > current callbacks use asynchronous rpc tasks instead of > kthreads--apologies. I'll try to get those into for-2.6.31 tomorrow, > and then I hope you won't mind working on top of that? > > --b. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Benny >> >> [RFC 01/10] nfsd: cleanup nfs4.0 callback encode routines >> [RFC 02/10] nfsd: minorversion support for the back channel >> [RFC 03/10] nfsd41: sunrpc: Added rpc server-side backchannel handling >> [RFC 04/10] nfsd41: Remember the auth flavor to use for callbacks >> [RFC 05/10] nfsd41: callback infrastructure >> [RFC 06/10] nfsd41: Backchannel: Add sequence arguments to callback RPC >> arguments >> [RFC 07/10] nfsd41: Backchannel: Server backchannel RPC wait queue >> [RFC 08/10] nfsd41: Backchannel: Setup sequence information >> [RFC 09/10] nfsd41: cb_sequence callback >> [RFC 10/10] nfsd41: cb_recall callback -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
