Re: [PATCH 0/11] nfsd: Summary of "Improve NFS server performance"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05:14AM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 04/22/2009 04:27:28 AM:
> 
> > The numbers look promising, but very noisy.  Maybe an average of a few
> > tests would give more stable numbers?
> 
> Is it enough if I cut out some "popular" bufsizes and #processes out of
> that
> table and post it? If so, here is a smaller list:

By "noisy" I just mean that they look like there's a lot of randomness.
So, yes, I'm fine with a subset, but I'm curious what the variance is on
repeated runs of each test.

--b.

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> #Processes      Bufsize         OrgBW KB/s      New BW KB/s     %
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4               4096            60660.67        64309.37        6.01
> 4               16384           60796.86        64069.82        5.38
> 4               65536           60774.45        63735.24        4.87
> 4               131072          61369.66        65261.85        6.34
> 
> 8               4096            50650.45        55400.01        9.37
> 8               16384           51114.76        56025.31        9.60
> 8               65536           51000.23        54285.63        6.44
> 8               131072          52996.73        54021.11        1.93
> 
> 16              4096            43897.69        46519.89        5.97
> 16              16384           43883.62        46726.03        6.47
> 16              65536           43804.33        44865.20        2.42
> 16              131072          44525.30        43752.62        -1.73
> 
> 32              4096            39913.14        42279.21        5.92
> 32              16384           38094.95        42645.32        11.94
> 32              65536           41438.05        41794.76        .86
> 32              131072          41869.06        43644.07        4.23
> 
> 64              4096            35468.42        35529.29        .17
> 64              16384           31926.51        32694.91        2.40
> 64              65536           36066.08        36359.77        .81
> 64              131072          35969.04        37462.86        4.15
> 
> 128             4096            29311.11        30097.65        2.68
> 128             16384           28283.58        29071.45        2.78
> 128             65536           32617.13        33778.46        3.56
> 128             131072          32972.71        34160.82        3.60
> 
> 192             4096            27368.48        29318.49        7.12
> 192             16384           26388.54        29719.15        12.62
> 192             65536           33374.85        33607.14        .69
> 192             131072          33523.48        32601.93        -2.74
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                 1170059.88      1223737.36      4.58%
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - KK
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux