"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 04/22/2009 04:27:28 AM:
> The numbers look promising, but very noisy. Maybe an average of a few
> tests would give more stable numbers?
Is it enough if I cut out some "popular" bufsizes and #processes out of
that
table and post it? If so, here is a smaller list:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#Processes Bufsize OrgBW KB/s New BW KB/s %
----------------------------------------------------------------------
4 4096 60660.67 64309.37 6.01
4 16384 60796.86 64069.82 5.38
4 65536 60774.45 63735.24 4.87
4 131072 61369.66 65261.85 6.34
8 4096 50650.45 55400.01 9.37
8 16384 51114.76 56025.31 9.60
8 65536 51000.23 54285.63 6.44
8 131072 52996.73 54021.11 1.93
16 4096 43897.69 46519.89 5.97
16 16384 43883.62 46726.03 6.47
16 65536 43804.33 44865.20 2.42
16 131072 44525.30 43752.62 -1.73
32 4096 39913.14 42279.21 5.92
32 16384 38094.95 42645.32 11.94
32 65536 41438.05 41794.76 .86
32 131072 41869.06 43644.07 4.23
64 4096 35468.42 35529.29 .17
64 16384 31926.51 32694.91 2.40
64 65536 36066.08 36359.77 .81
64 131072 35969.04 37462.86 4.15
128 4096 29311.11 30097.65 2.68
128 16384 28283.58 29071.45 2.78
128 65536 32617.13 33778.46 3.56
128 131072 32972.71 34160.82 3.60
192 4096 27368.48 29318.49 7.12
192 16384 26388.54 29719.15 12.62
192 65536 33374.85 33607.14 .69
192 131072 33523.48 32601.93 -2.74
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1170059.88 1223737.36 4.58%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
- KK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
