Re: [PATCH] out of order WRITE requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust wrote:

Heh.... I happen to have a _very_ similar patch that is basically
designed to prevent new pages from being dirtied, and thus allowing
those cache consistency flushes at close() and stat() to make progress.
The difference is that I'm locking over nfs_write_mapping() instead of
nfs_writepages()...

Perhaps we should combine the two patches? If so, we need to convert
nfs_write_mapping() to only flush once using the WB_SYNC_ALL mode,
instead of the current 2 pass system...

Heh, indeed!  :-)

The combined patch looks fine to me, although I will have to
look at the changes to nfs_write_begin and nfs_write_mapping
to understand what their ramifications are.

I have another patch to propose which adds some flow control
to allow the NFS client to better control the number of pages
which can be dirtied per file.  I implemented this support in
response to a customer who had a server which required in-
order WRITE requests in order to function correctly.  It
also could not handle too much data being sent to it at a
time, so it functioned better when the client spaced out the
sending of data more smoothly.

It turns out that this framework can be used to solve the
stat() problem quite neatly.

I will construct a patch which applies on top of the combined
patch and post that, if that is okay.

   Thanx...

      ps
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux