Re: [PATCH 8/8] NLM: allow lockd requests from an unprivileged port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 5, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 16:25 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Nov 5, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 15:25 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
If the admin has specified the "noresvport" option for an NFS mount
point, the kernel's NFS client uses an unprivileged source port for
the main NFS transport.  The kernel's lockd client should use an
unprivileged port in this case as well.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

error: patch failed: fs/lockd/host.c:44
error: fs/lockd/host.c: patch does not apply

I mentioned that in the cover letter. It's another case where patches
I've sent to you depend on patches that Bruce is taking.

OK. Dropping that patch...

That should be OK to do.  We can add it back later.

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux