Re: [PATCH 8/8] NLM: allow lockd requests from an unprivileged port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 16:25 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 15:25 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> If the admin has specified the "noresvport" option for an NFS mount
> >> point, the kernel's NFS client uses an unprivileged source port for
> >> the main NFS transport.  The kernel's lockd client should use an
> >> unprivileged port in this case as well.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >
> > error: patch failed: fs/lockd/host.c:44
> > error: fs/lockd/host.c: patch does not apply
> 
> I mentioned that in the cover letter.  It's another case where patches  
> I've sent to you depend on patches that Bruce is taking.

OK. Dropping that patch...

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux