J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:30:03PM +0000, Phil Endecott wrote: >> J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:13:20AM +0000, Phil Endecott wrote: >>>> Dear Experts, >>>> >>>> sm-notify was taking a long time while my laptop booted. This was >>>> odd because I use NFS only rarely - via autofs - on that machine, and >>>> sm-notify actually has no-one to notify most of the time. So I have >>>> patched it as follows. Is this a legitimate thing to do? >>> It looks like your patch was committed to nfs-utils a couple weeks ago: >>> see c8d18e26d2a53d9036a32c2dafebccaf4ce1634d from >>> >>> git://linux-nfs.org/nfs-utils >>> >>> --b. >> How curious. I guess someone saw my Debian bug report. No mention of >> it on this list as far as I can see though. >> >> I presume from this that it is considered a safe thing to do. > > It looks right to me. Hopefully somebody actually has tested this on a > client that holds locks when it reboots? I did... things worked as expected.... steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
