On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:13:20AM +0000, Phil Endecott wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> sm-notify was taking a long time while my laptop booted. This was odd because I
> use NFS only rarely - via autofs - on that machine, and sm-notify actually has
> no-one to notify most of the time. So I have patched it as follows. Is this a
> legitimate thing to do?
It looks like your patch was committed to nfs-utils a couple weeks ago:
see c8d18e26d2a53d9036a32c2dafebccaf4ce1634d from
git://linux-nfs.org/nfs-utils
--b.
>
>
> diff -ur nfs-utils-1.1.3.orig/utils/statd/sm-notify.c nfs-utils-1.1.3/utils/statd/sm-notify.c
> --- nfs-utils-1.1.3.orig/utils/statd/sm-notify.c 2008-07-27 22:01:45.000000000 +0100
> +++ nfs-utils-1.1.3/utils/statd/sm-notify.c 2008-10-13 19:02:54.000000000 +0100
> @@ -169,6 +169,10 @@
> backup_hosts(_SM_DIR_PATH, _SM_BAK_PATH);
> get_hosts(_SM_BAK_PATH);
>
> + if (!hosts) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> /* Get and update the NSM state. This will call sync() */
> nsm_state = nsm_get_state(opt_update_state);
> set_kernel_nsm_state(nsm_state);
>
>
>
> Regards, Phil.
> (Please Cc: me in any replies.)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
