On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 07:17:33PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 16:37 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > It's possible, the good case is naturally quite hard to establish with > > 100% certainty. I declared v2.6.26 OK after an uptime of 4 days and 19 > > hours, compared with failure normally within 1-2 days. It's possible I > > was premature in doing so. I'll run 2e96d2867 for at least a full week > > before reporting back. > > Or it'll reproduce after just a few hours :-/ > > Looks like a false negative on v2.6.26 -- I'll retest from there. OK, so apologies, but this has been a long thread, and maybe we could use a summary of the symptoms and the results so far. I think you said 2.6.24 or .25 was the last you're *positive* was good? --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
