On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 16:37 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > It's possible, the good case is naturally quite hard to establish with > 100% certainty. I declared v2.6.26 OK after an uptime of 4 days and 19 > hours, compared with failure normally within 1-2 days. It's possible I > was premature in doing so. I'll run 2e96d2867 for at least a full week > before reporting back. Or it'll reproduce after just a few hours :-/ Looks like a false negative on v2.6.26 -- I'll retest from there. Ian. -- Ian Campbell That secret you've been guarding, isn't.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
