Hi,
Thanks all for your input first.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Trond Myklebust
<trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What does
>
> 'rpcinfo -p 10.10.10.1'
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100021 1 udp 32773 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32773 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 32773 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 32779 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 32779 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 32779 nlockmgr
100024 1 udp 883 status
100024 1 tcp 886 status
100011 1 udp 821 rquotad
100011 2 udp 821 rquotad
100011 1 tcp 824 rquotad
100011 2 tcp 824 rquotad
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
100003 4 udp 2049 nfs
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs
100005 1 udp 891 mountd
100005 1 tcp 894 mountd
100005 2 udp 891 mountd
100005 2 tcp 894 mountd
100005 3 udp 891 mountd
100005 3 tcp 894 mountd
> give you? Also,
>
> 'showmount -e 10.10.10.1'
>
Export list for 10.10.10.1
/data0/tmp 10.10.10.2
> That depends. In my experience, the difference in performance on an
> unloaded network, then UDP will outperform TCP by ~10%. However, if you
> have a heavily loaded network with lots of dropped packets, then TCP
> will usually give much better performance than UDP.
Good to know! I will definitely have a test, any parameters are also
recommend together with TCP so I can do a fair benchmark?
Thank you again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
