Hi, On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Talpey, Thomas <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 11:05 AM 9/26/2008, howard chen wrote: > You didn't indicate what the client and server were, btw. client is 3, as I see when mount with verbose option: ... mount: trying xxxx prog 100003 vers 3 prot udp port 2049 server should be also 3, default by CentOS 4.4, 64bit > > Do you have multiple interfaces on the client? If the client routing > originates from a different address than 10.10.10.2, then the server > will deny it because you have specified a numerical address. Yes, both servers have interface for public IP, but as I can see the 10.10.10.2 in /var/log/message of NFS server, so I think routing is ok. > This isn't the source of the permissions error, but why are you doing > a UDP mount, and with only three retries? Generally, TCP will perform > better, and more robustly. Also, the "noatime" option is a no-op for > the NFS client (servers are in charge of maintaining atime). I agree TCP is more robust, but isn't UDP will have a better performance? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
