On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:30:33PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: > On 09/24/2008 9:49:34 pm +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 02:42:25PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 13:42 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >> > >>> If by "broken" you mean, "introduces a new kernel bug", I don't see it. > >> I mean it introduces utterly unnecessary complications that may return > >> to bite us in the arse at a future time. > > > > OK, that's the answer I was looking for, thanks. > > > >> Remember how we once said that it would never make sense for child > >> clones to call the portmapper, and so we added the BUG_ON() in > >> rpcb_getport_async; well guess what, we currently have a bug to fix... > > > > No, I don't remember that. But yes, I can see how in general this sort > > of thing could make the code harder to maintain. > > > >> One pretty obvious fix is to simply move the release method so that it > >> doesn't occur when you release a child. The disadvantage is that a child > >> may then not change its program to one that requires a release method > >> (do we need that?). > > > > I doubt we need that, but... > > > >> Another fix would be to add a refcount to the rpc_program structure... > > > > ... a refcount seems more straightforward. Benny, what do you think? > > I agree. I'll send a patch hopefully tomorrow. > Would you like that combined with the one I sent or as a separate one? > (I'm inclined towards the latter). That'd be fine. > One more thing that seems to need fixing is rpc_bind_new_program > which now uses the passed-in program->cl_stats but doesn't point > to the passed-in program, but rather it only extracts its > name, number, and stats. > Since program->stats may possibly go away with the program > in the refcounted world I think we should get a reference on the > program here too. > > That observed, it may also be a good idea to get rid of clnt->cl_stats > altogether and use clnt->program->stats instead to prevent any > discrepancy. Sounds good to me. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
