Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 16:14 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote:
Given that we seem to "own" time_in_range(), how about the
attached patch which just modifies time_in_range() to calculate
[b,c) instead of [b,c], removes the special case for attrtimeo==0
in nfs_attribute_timeout() and adds a comment that Chuck requested
concerning the need to ensure that zero timeout values continue
to work?
I'm fine with that, but still suggest that you change the name in order
to avoid confusing possible out-of-tree users.
Okie doke. I will introduce time_in_range_open(), retest, and then
repost the patch. Unfortunately, modifying jiffies.h means pretty
much a full kernel build instead of a small incremental build... :-(
Thanx!
ps
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
