On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 16:14 -0400, Peter Staubach wrote: > Given that we seem to "own" time_in_range(), how about the > attached patch which just modifies time_in_range() to calculate > [b,c) instead of [b,c], removes the special case for attrtimeo==0 > in nfs_attribute_timeout() and adds a comment that Chuck requested > concerning the need to ensure that zero timeout values continue > to work? I'm fine with that, but still suggest that you change the name in order to avoid confusing possible out-of-tree users. Cheers Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
