Jeff Layton wrote: > The special handling for SIGHUP in knfsd is a holdover from much > earlier versions of Linux where reloading the export table was > more expensive. That facility is not really needed anymore and > to my knowledge, is seldom-used. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > @@ -234,10 +226,9 @@ int nfsd_create_serv(void) > } > > atomic_set(&nfsd_busy, 0); > - nfsd_serv = svc_create_pooled(&nfsd_program, > - nfsd_max_blksize, > - nfsd_last_thread, > - nfsd, SIG_NOCLEAN, THIS_MODULE); > + nfsd_serv = svc_create_pooled(&nfsd_program, nfsd_max_blksize, > + nfsd_last_thread, nfsd, SIGINT, > + THIS_MODULE); > Now that there's no special interpretation of signals, you could probably also remove the `sig' argument to svc_create_pooled() and the svc_serv->sv_kill_signal field. -- Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. The cake is *not* a lie. I don't speak for SGI. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
