Hi Detlev, On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:24:25 -0400 Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Unfortunately, this fix is incorrect as nodes must be in address order, so > ufshc: ufshc@2a2d0000 must be above sfc1: spi@2a300000. OK, I have switched it around in my resolution. > As we are close the the merge window, I won't mind if the patches have to be > postponed to the next cycle, but some device trees won't build anymore. > > This can also be left as is with a new patch to fix the order (to be backported > if needed) This merge resolution will be redone by Linus when the trees are merged during the merge window. Someone just needs to mention it to him. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpFQkBHA_t2E.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
