Hi Stephen,
On Tuesday, 11 March 2025 03:35:24 EDT Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3576.dtsi
>
> between commit:
>
> 36299757129c ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add SFC nodes for rk3576")
>
> from the rockchip tree and commit:
>
> c75e5e010fef ("scsi: arm64: dts: rockchip: Add UFS support for RK3576
> SoC")
>
> from the scsi tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Unfortunately, this fix is incorrect as nodes must be in address order, so
ufshc: ufshc@2a2d0000 must be above sfc1: spi@2a300000.
As we are close the the merge window, I won't mind if the patches have to be
postponed to the next cycle, but some device trees won't build anymore.
This can also be left as is with a new patch to fix the order (to be backported
if needed)
Regards,
Detlev.
