Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the f2fs tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/9/5 8:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:24:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:

   fs/f2fs/data.c

between commits:

   f13c7184e62e ("f2fs: convert f2fs_write_begin() to use folio")
   357dd8479f8b ("f2fs: convert f2fs_write_end() to use folio")
(and maybe others)

from the f2fs tree and commits:

   a0f858d450ce ("f2fs: Convert f2fs_write_end() to use a folio")
   dfd2e81d37e1 ("f2fs: Convert f2fs_write_begin() to use a folio")
   a225800f322a ("fs: Convert aops->write_end to take a folio")
   1da86618bdce ("fs: Convert aops->write_begin to take a folio")

from the vfs-brauner tree.

This was too much for me to fix up, so I just used the f2fs tree from
next-20240830 for today.  Please discuss this and fix things up.

I took another shot at this and *I think* I figured it out - see below
and I have also attached the final version of this file.  Please check
and advise.

The fix looks fine.

Thanks,





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux