Hi all, After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf) failed like this: perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c: In function 'yy_get_previous_state': perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:1919:9: error: expected expression at end of input 1919 | for ( yy_cp = (yytext_ptr) + YY_MORE_ADJ; yy_cp < (yy_c_buf_p); ++yy_cp ) | ^~~ perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:1919:9: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:1919:9: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type] perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c: At top level: perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:20:31: error: 'perf_bpf_filter_ensure_buffer_stack' used but never defined [-Werror] 20 | #define yyensure_buffer_stack perf_bpf_filter_ensure_buffer_stack | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:550:13: note: in expansion of macro 'yyensure_buffer_stack' 550 | static void yyensure_buffer_stack ( void ); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:16:30: error: 'perf_bpf_filter__load_buffer_state' used but never defined [-Werror] 16 | #define yy_load_buffer_state perf_bpf_filter__load_buffer_state | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:551:13: note: in expansion of macro 'yy_load_buffer_state' 551 | static void yy_load_buffer_state ( void ); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:604:22: error: 'yy_try_NUL_trans' used but never defined [-Werror] 604 | static yy_state_type yy_try_NUL_trans ( yy_state_type current_state ); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:606:24: error: 'yy_fatal_error' used but never defined [-Werror] 606 | static void yynoreturn yy_fatal_error ( const char* msg ); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ perf/util/bpf-filter-flex.c:510:15: error: 'yy_buffer_stack_max' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-variable] 510 | static size_t yy_buffer_stack_max = 0; /**< capacity of stack. */ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors I don't know what caused this, but just redoing the build worked. Is there maybe a dependency missing? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp_yv7YplXB9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature