Re: Request for i2c re-inclusion in linux-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 02:33:18PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> > whichever you prefer. There you will see the two branches. I am
> > trying to copy Wolfram's way of doing things.

> If you copy my style, then only for-next goes to linux-next.

> I have branches for-mergewindow and for-current which I let Linus pull.
> I merge both branches into for-next for Stephen.

It might be worth having -next pull in the fixes branch separately (even
if you also merge it into your for-next) - as well as the main tree
-next also publishes a pending-fixes branch carrying only the things
targeted as fixes.  Some of the CI systems test that independently, the
goal is to catch issues with fixes having unexpected dependencies on
other things in -next (we had a few incidents with that at one point).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux