On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 07:54:04AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > > could you please include in the linux-next i2c related branches > > > from my repository: > > > > > > https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git > > > > > > the following branches: > > > > > > for next: i2c/for-next > > > fixes: i2c/for-current > > > > > > I have requested this branch to be the main repository for > > > collecting i2c host patches[*]. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Andi > > > > > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240124225031.3152667-1-andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > OK, I currently have an i2c tree from Wolfram who is listed as the > > maintainer, so I need to hear from him (and do you meant to replace his > > tree, or add another one?). > > Yes, I'm going to replace Wolfram's tree. We've been agreeing > together on this change. Sorry, replace only for the subsystem in the linked patch, as Wolfram has confirmed. > > Also, above you list a git tree from > > kernel.googlesource.com, but in the patch above, you use > > git.kernel.org. The latter is preferred. And currently, they do *not* > > have the same i2c/for-next and i2c/for-current head commits. > > Oh! You are right! I have done a lazy replacement > /wsa/andi\.shyti/. Will update with the correct git.kernel.org > repository. Actually, the patch was right, but my mail was wrong, I did a copy paste of my previous mail to you. The repository is this one: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git or its https version: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git whichever you prefer. There you will see the two branches. I am trying to copy Wolfram's way of doing things. sorry for the confusion. Andi
