Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David,

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 19:55:13 +0200 David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have updated my for-next branch again, sorry (top commit 1a4dc97c883a4f763cbaf50).
> There are some fixes I don't want to miss from the 6.7 pull request.
> There should be minimal change to the VFS tree conflict resolution so
> the diff should be reusable.

So, why did you not just merge in v6.6-rc7 (or better yet, the branch
that contains the fix(es) that Linus merged) and then apply your new
commits on top of that?  All the commits that were in the btrfs tree
have been rebased unchanged.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpjMCDKS4LuK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux