On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 06:14, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the gpio-brgl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/hte/hte-tegra194.c: In function 'tegra_hte_line_xlate':
> drivers/hte/hte-tegra194.c:424:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_device_get_base'; did you mean 'gpio_device_get_desc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 424 | line_id = desc->attr.line_id - gpio_device_get_base(gs->gdev);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | gpio_device_get_desc
> drivers/hte/hte-tegra194.c: In function 'tegra_hte_match_from_linedata':
> drivers/hte/hte-tegra194.c:652:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_to_device'; did you mean 'gpio_to_desc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 652 | gpiod_to_device(hdesc->attr.line_data);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | gpio_to_desc
> drivers/hte/hte-tegra194.c:652:33: error: initialization of 'struct gpio_device *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> Caused by commit
>
> ebee532ff34b ("hte: tegra194: don't access struct gpio_chip")
>
> (Exposed by commit
>
> 63137bee5a7a ("hte: allow building modules with COMPILE_TEST enabled")
>
> from the hte tree.)
>
> I have used the gpio-brgl tree from next-20231012 for today.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Gah, we have a couple reworks going on at the same time and I messed
up the order of applying the patches. And the name of
gpiod_to_device() was changed to gpiod_to_gpio_device() and no longer
increases the reference count of the device.
Dipen, I backed out the HTE patch, I will fix it up and resend it
making sure it builds correctly with my gpio/for-next branch.
Bartosz
