On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 2:48 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The following commits are also in the overlayfs tree as different commits > (but the same patches): > > 149f455798a6 ("smb: move cifs_xattr_handlers to .rodata") > 295d3c441226 ("net: move sockfs_xattr_handlers to .rodata") > 2f5028604f08 ("shmem: move shmem_xattr_handlers to .rodata") > 375aa21d36ee ("xfs: move xfs_xattr_handlers to .rodata") > 3d649a4a832e ("overlayfs: move xattr tables to .rodata") > c08a831c74f0 ("squashfs: move squashfs_xattr_handlers to .rodata") > c25308c326db ("ubifs: move ubifs_xattr_handlers to .rodata") > > Looks like the overlatfs tree has merged a previous verion of a topic > branch from the vfs-brauner tree. Yeh, sorry my bad. Christian told me that vfs.xattr branch was stable, but I did not notice that I had merged a day old version. Fixed now. BTW, Christian, feel free to fast forward the stable vfs.xattr branch to a640d888953c const_structs.checkpatch: add xattr_handler it won't be a problem for me. Thanks, Amir.