Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-perf tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 10:45:18PM -0700, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the arm-perf tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > 
> > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c: In function 'ampere_cspmu_set_ev_filter':
> > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c:164:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'writel' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >  164 |         writel(threshold, cspmu->base0 + PMAUXR0);
> > >      |         ^~~~~~
> > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > > 
> > > Caused by commit
> > > 
> > >  290a9c0e55f8 ("perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU")
> > > 
> > > I have used the arm-perf tree from next-20231009 for today.
> > 
> > Thanks for catching the bug! It doesn't seem to happen on arm64 build but I
> > can reproduce it on x86_64 build indeed.
> > 
> > 
> > Will, it seems that "#include <linux/io.h>" is missing from ampere_cspmu.c.
> > After that also x86_64 build goes through. How would you like to get the bug
> > fixed? Shall I submit a new version of the patch, and you would replace the
> > old patch with the new one or is it better to
> > create a completely new patch that only adds the missing include line?
> 
> If it's just a missing include, I can chuck a patch on top to fix it myself.
> I'll double-check it resolves the problem and then update the branch.

In the end I just fixed up your commit, as it was still on the HEAD of the
branch. Update now pushed out!

Cheers,

Will



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux