On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 10:45:18PM -0700, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the arm-perf tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c: In function 'ampere_cspmu_set_ev_filter':
> > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c:164:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'writel' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 164 | writel(threshold, cspmu->base0 + PMAUXR0);
> > | ^~~~~~
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 290a9c0e55f8 ("perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU")
> >
> > I have used the arm-perf tree from next-20231009 for today.
>
> Thanks for catching the bug! It doesn't seem to happen on arm64 build but I
> can reproduce it on x86_64 build indeed.
>
>
> Will, it seems that "#include <linux/io.h>" is missing from ampere_cspmu.c.
> After that also x86_64 build goes through. How would you like to get the bug
> fixed? Shall I submit a new version of the patch, and you would replace the
> old patch with the new one or is it better to
> create a completely new patch that only adds the missing include line?
If it's just a missing include, I can chuck a patch on top to fix it myself.
I'll double-check it resolves the problem and then update the branch.
Thanks!
Will
