Hi Stephen, On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:20:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi David, > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:20:11 +0200 David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I tried 12 and 13, no warnings on x86_64, however the report is on > > powerpc. If this is on a big endian host it could be a valid warning, we > > have an optmization where the on-disk format endianity matches CPU > > (little endian) then the structures btrfs_disk_key and btrfs_key are > > equivalent and no coversion is needed. > > > > There were some changes that might be related and newly added to > > for-next so we don't have any other reference point, I'll take a look. > > This is indeed a big endian build (big endian cross build on a little > endian host). I also did *not* get these warnings on my x86_64 build. But I do get them from my s390 defconfig build. Any progress? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpQZo00Nmqtg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
