Hi all, After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings: In file included from include/linux/swab.h:5, from include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:14, from include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:5, from arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:14, from include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:6, from arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:336, from include/linux/bitops.h:68, from fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3: In function 'btrfs_disk_key_to_cpu', inlined from 'btrfs_item_key_to_cpu' at fs/btrfs/accessors.h:648:2, inlined from 'fiemap_find_last_extent_offset' at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2804:2, inlined from 'extent_fiemap' at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2879:8: include/uapi/linux/swab.h:128:28: warning: 'disk_key.objectid' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 128 | #define __swab64(x) (__u64)__builtin_bswap64((__u64)(x)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:33:26: note: in expansion of macro '__swab64' 33 | #define __le64_to_cpu(x) __swab64((__force __u64)(__le64)(x)) | ^~~~~~~~ include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:87:21: note: in expansion of macro '__le64_to_cpu' 87 | #define le64_to_cpu __le64_to_cpu | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/btrfs/accessors.h:622:25: note: in expansion of macro 'le64_to_cpu' 622 | cpu->objectid = le64_to_cpu(disk->objectid); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:34: fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'extent_fiemap': fs/btrfs/accessors.h:645:31: note: 'disk_key.objectid' was declared here 645 | struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key; | ^~~~~~~~ In function 'fiemap_find_last_extent_offset', inlined from 'extent_fiemap' at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2879:8: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2805:33: warning: 'disk_key.type' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 2805 | if (key.objectid != ino || key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY) { fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'extent_fiemap': fs/btrfs/accessors.h:645:31: note: 'disk_key.type' was declared here 645 | struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key; | ^~~~~~~~ I don't really have any idea what caused this (it *may* have been my change from gcc v12 to v13?). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpF4pnADV_Hb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature