On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 04:06:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2023 at 18:56, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Following arm64 builds failed on Linux next-20230517.
> >
> > - build/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size
> > - build/gcc-11-lkftconfig-64k_page_size
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Build log:
> > ======
> > include/asm-generic/div64.h:46:27: warning: conversion from 'long
> > unsigned int' to 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from
> > '4398046511104' to '0' [-Woverflow]
> > 46 | uint32_t __base = (base); \
> > | ^
> > include/linux/math.h:40:44: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
> > 40 | ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll); do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
> > | ^~~~~~
> > include/linux/math.h:43:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL'
> > 43 | DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL((unsigned long long)(ll) + (d) - 1, (d))
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c:95:22: note: in expansion of macro 'DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL'
> > 95 | n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PUD_SIZE);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > In file included from <command-line>:
> > mm/huge_memory.c: In function 'hugepage_init':
> > include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:45: error: call to
> > '__compiletime_assert_494' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> > failed: (((16 - 3) * (4 - (2)) + 3)-16) > 10
> > 397 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> > __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> > | ^
> > include/linux/compiler_types.h:378:25: note: in definition of macro
> > '__compiletime_assert'
> > 378 | prefix ## suffix();
> > \
> > | ^~~~~~
> > include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:9: note: in expansion of macro
> > '_compiletime_assert'
> > 397 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> > __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
> > 'compiletime_assert'
> > 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> > 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/linux/bug.h:24:25: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
> > 24 | BUILD_BUG_ON(cond); \
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > mm/huge_memory.c:470:9: note: in expansion of macro 'MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON'
> > 470 | MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER > MAX_ORDER);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: mm/huge_memory.o] Error 1
>
> Linux next 20230517 arm64 64k page size build failed.
>
> - CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Anders bisected and found the following is the first bad commit.
>
> commit fd2d1cb8c5454888f67aba4c6218e30106862070
> Author: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed May 3 13:33:42 2023 +0100
>
> arm64: Make the ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER config input prompt unconditional
We are dropping this commit for now but the problem is still there with
EXPERT enabled.
The problem is that we start with ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER of 10 in
defconfig and we then change the page size to 64K but this value is no
longer valid (only 13 works for this page size).
I'll send a patch dropping the config description entirely, unless there
are some strong requirements to have the ranges back.
--
Catalin
