On Wed, 17 May 2023 at 18:56, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Following arm64 builds failed on Linux next-20230517.
>
> - build/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size
> - build/gcc-11-lkftconfig-64k_page_size
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Build log:
> ======
> include/asm-generic/div64.h:46:27: warning: conversion from 'long
> unsigned int' to 'uint32_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from
> '4398046511104' to '0' [-Woverflow]
> 46 | uint32_t __base = (base); \
> | ^
> include/linux/math.h:40:44: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
> 40 | ({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll); do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
> | ^~~~~~
> include/linux/math.h:43:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL'
> 43 | DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL((unsigned long long)(ll) + (d) - 1, (d))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c:95:22: note: in expansion of macro 'DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL'
> 95 | n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PUD_SIZE);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from <command-line>:
> mm/huge_memory.c: In function 'hugepage_init':
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:45: error: call to
> '__compiletime_assert_494' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: (((16 - 3) * (4 - (2)) + 3)-16) > 10
> 397 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> | ^
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:378:25: note: in definition of macro
> '__compiletime_assert'
> 378 | prefix ## suffix();
> \
> | ^~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:9: note: in expansion of macro
> '_compiletime_assert'
> 397 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
> 'compiletime_assert'
> 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/bug.h:24:25: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
> 24 | BUILD_BUG_ON(cond); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/huge_memory.c:470:9: note: in expansion of macro 'MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON'
> 470 | MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER > MAX_ORDER);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: mm/huge_memory.o] Error 1
Linux next 20230517 arm64 64k page size build failed.
- CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
Anders bisected and found the following is the first bad commit.
commit fd2d1cb8c5454888f67aba4c6218e30106862070
Author: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed May 3 13:33:42 2023 +0100
arm64: Make the ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER config input prompt unconditional
Commit 34affcd7577a ("arm64: drop ranges in definition of
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER") dropped the ranges from the config entry and
introduced an EXPERT condition on the input prompt instead. This change
may affect some distro kernels that change ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER but do
not want to enable EXPERT.
Drop EXPERT from the input prompt together with the (ARM64_4K_PAGES ||
ARM64_16K_PAGES) condition as the latter no longer makes sense after the
ranges were removed. The latter makes all the page size configurations
consistent w.r.t. ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.
Fixes: 34affcd7577a ("arm64: drop ranges in definition of
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER")
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230503123342.90538-1-catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
>
>
> logs:
> =====
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230517/testrun/17031010/suite/build/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size/log
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230517/testrun/17031010/suite/build/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size/history/
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230517/testrun/17031010/suite/build/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-64k_page_size/details/
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> ====
> # To install tuxmake on your system globally:
> # sudo pip3 install -U tuxmake
> #
> # See https://docs.tuxmake.org/ for complete documentation.
> # Original tuxmake command with fragments listed below.
> # tuxmake \
> --runtime podman \
> --target-arch arm64 \
> --toolchain gcc-12 \
> --kconfig defconfig \
> --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/lkft.config
> \
> --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/lkft-crypto.config
> \
> --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/distro-overrides.config
> \
> --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/systemd.config
> \
> --kconfig-add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/kirkstone/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/files/virtio.config
> \
> --kconfig-add CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS=y \
> --kconfig-add CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y \
> --kconfig-add CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y \
> --kconfig-add CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y
>
> OR
>
> tuxmake \
> --runtime podman \
> --target-arch arm64 \
> --toolchain gcc-12 \
> --kconfig https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2PtylMMZpP2yGvgCnhE5SZngOYJ/config
>
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org
