On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 3:43 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 04.01.2022 09:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Heiner,
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 08:29:28 +0100 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> The patch in the pm tree annotating pm_runtime_resume_and_get() as __must_check
> >> follows some fixes of pm_runtime_resume_and_get() usage that went through other
> >> trees. These fixes are in linux-next but don't seem to be in the pm tree.
> >> We talk about:
> >> f04b4fb47d83 ("ASoC: sh: rz-ssi: Check return value of pm_runtime_resume_and_get()")
> >
> > In the sound-asoc tree.
> >
> >> 3d6b661330a7 ("crypto: stm32 - Revert broken pm_runtime_resume_and_get changes")
> >
> > In the crypto tree.
> >
> > Both those are merged into linux-next after the pm tree. If Linus did
> > the same, the pm tree commit would break his build. The only way you
> > can have that pm tree commit in linux-next is to ask Andrew Morton to
> > put it in the post linux-next part of his patch series. Otherwise, it
> > needs to be removed form the pm tree and wait until after the next
> > merge window closes (or at least both the above trees have been merged
> > by Linus).
> >
> Rafael,
> can you take care of this?
Done.
I've dropped the commit in question from pm-core and I'm going to add
it back and submit by the end of the merge window.
