Hi all,
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:39:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/btrfs/file.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 0225a20db6d8 ("btrfs: Prevent nowait or async read from doing sync IO")
>
> from the btrfs tree and commit:
>
> ddcd14c48a30 ("mm/filemap: rename generic_file_buffered_read to filemap_read")
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 5282f456c99c,898ef7b792b7..000000000000
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@@ -3629,18 -3639,7 +3629,18 @@@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_read_iter(str
> return ret;
> }
>
> - return filemap_read(iocb, to, ret);
> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
> + iocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOIO;
> +
> - ret = generic_file_buffered_read(iocb, to, ret);
> ++ ret = filemap_read(iocb, to, ret);
> +
> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
> + iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_NOIO;
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> const struct file_operations btrfs_file_operations = {
With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.
The btrfs tree commit is now
1605f1b63c76 ("btrfs: Prevent nowait or async read from doing sync IO")
The akpm-current commit is now
de45c82ebea8 ("mm/filemap: rename generic_file_buffered_read to filemap_read")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpZfUWgPW1Wu.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
