Hi all,
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:24:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:14:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 01ea173e103e ("xfs: fix up non-directory creation in SGID directories")
> >
> > from the xfs tree and commit:
> >
> > f736d93d76d3 ("xfs: support idmapped mounts")
> >
> > from the pidfd tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > index e2a1db4cee43,95b7f2ba4e06..000000000000
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> > @@@ -809,13 -810,13 +810,13 @@@ xfs_init_new_inode
> > inode->i_rdev = rdev;
> > ip->i_d.di_projid = prid;
> >
> > - if (pip && XFS_INHERIT_GID(pip)) {
> > - inode->i_gid = VFS_I(pip)->i_gid;
> > - if ((VFS_I(pip)->i_mode & S_ISGID) && S_ISDIR(mode))
> > - inode->i_mode |= S_ISGID;
> > + if (dir && !(dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) &&
> > + (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_GRPID)) {
> > + inode->i_uid = current_fsuid();
>
> Looking a bit harder, I replaced the above line with
> inode->i_uid = fsuid_into_mnt(mnt_userns);
>
> > + inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid;
> > + inode->i_mode = mode;
> > } else {
> > - inode_init_owner(inode, dir, mode);
> > - inode->i_gid = fsgid_into_mnt(mnt_userns);
> > ++ inode_init_owner(mnt_userns, inode, dir, mode);
> > }
> >
> > /*
With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpY25vXqT62L.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
