On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 11:24 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfs tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 21e31401fc45 ("NFS: Disable READ_PLUS by default")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 5c3485bb12c9 ("NFSv4.2/pnfs: Don't use READ_PLUS with pNFS yet")
>
> from the nfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thanks Stephen!
Yes, the fixes for the client side READ_PLUS code ended up being a
little more extensive than hoped for in the last week of the 2.10
cycle, hence the need for a Kconfig option to disable it. Apologies for
the extra work it caused you.
Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
