Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the nfs tree got a conflict in:
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
between commit:
21e31401fc45 ("NFS: Disable READ_PLUS by default")
from Linus' tree and commit:
5c3485bb12c9 ("NFSv4.2/pnfs: Don't use READ_PLUS with pNFS yet")
from the nfs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index e89468678ae1,61a07dcb963d..000000000000
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@@ -5309,18 -5319,18 +5319,18 @@@ static int nfs4_read_done(struct rpc_ta
nfs4_read_done_cb(task, hdr);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_2
+#if defined CONFIG_NFS_V4_2 && defined CONFIG_NFS_V4_2_READ_PLUS
- static void nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_server *server, struct rpc_message *msg)
+ static void nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
+ struct rpc_message *msg)
{
- if (server->caps & NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS)
+ /* Note: We don't use READ_PLUS with pNFS yet */
+ if (nfs_server_capable(hdr->inode, NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS) && !hdr->ds_clp)
msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ_PLUS];
- else
- msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ];
}
#else
- static void nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_server *server, struct rpc_message *msg)
+ static void nfs42_read_plus_support(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
+ struct rpc_message *msg)
{
- msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ];
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_2 */
Attachment:
pgpiraQrTljuF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
