On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:55 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 9/8/20 6:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi Randy, > >> > >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>>>>> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Changes since 20200828: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> on i386: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’: > >>>>>> ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you mean ‘kunit_init_test’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > >>>>>> kunit_fail_current_test(); > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Full randconfig file is attached. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Brendan, > >>>>> > >>>>> Do you know anything about this build error? > >>>>> > >>>>> I can't find kunit_fail_current_test() anywhere. > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, this got applied for some reason without the prerequisite > >>>> patches. It is from a two patch series, the other being here: > >>>> > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200813205722.1384108-1-urielguajardojr@xxxxxxxxx/ > >>>> > >>>> which in turn depends on another patchset which didn't make it into 5.9. > >>>> > >>>> Again, I don't know why this was applied without it's prereqs. Sorry about that. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Well. Who is responsible for this small mess? > >>> It is still killing linux-next builds for me (2020-0908). > >> > >> It came in via the kunit-next tree (Shuah cc'd). I will revert commit > >> abe83f7621ee ("kunit: ubsan integration") today. > > > > > > Sorry about that. I picked this up for 5.10 since it had the reviewed > by tags from Brendan. > > I will drop this from kselftest kunit Thanks for taking care of this!
