On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>>> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes since 20200828: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> on i386: >>>>> >>>>> ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’: >>>>> ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you mean ‘kunit_init_test’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>>> kunit_fail_current_test(); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Full randconfig file is attached. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Brendan, >>>> >>>> Do you know anything about this build error? >>>> >>>> I can't find kunit_fail_current_test() anywhere. >>> >>> Yeah, this got applied for some reason without the prerequisite >>> patches. It is from a two patch series, the other being here: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200813205722.1384108-1-urielguajardojr@xxxxxxxxx/ >>> >>> which in turn depends on another patchset which didn't make it into 5.9. >>> >>> Again, I don't know why this was applied without it's prereqs. Sorry about that. >>> >> >> Well. Who is responsible for this small mess? >> It is still killing linux-next builds for me (2020-0908). > > It came in via the kunit-next tree (Shuah cc'd). I will revert commit > abe83f7621ee ("kunit: ubsan integration") today. Thank you! -- ~Randy
