Re: [PATCH 0/2] locking/qspinlock: Break qspinlock_types.h header loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:47:16AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well.
> Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures?

I don't think there is any technical difficulty.  The custom
atomic64_t simply adds an alignment requirement so the initialisor
remains the same.

I just didn't want to add more complexity to the existing patch.
As a follow-up patch it should be quite straightforward.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux