Re: [PATCH 0/2] locking/qspinlock: Break qspinlock_types.h header loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:00 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:04:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:35 PM Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 7/29/20 8:28 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > This patch series looks good to me. I just wonder if we should also move
> > > ATOMIC64_INIT() to types.h for symmetry purpose. Anyway,
> >
> > Same question here.
>
> Yes I almost started doing it but at least one architecture (arc)
> had a custom atomic64_t so I kept it out just to be on the safe
> side.

We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well.
Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures?

> We certainly could do this as a follow-up patch.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux