On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:54:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> Marco, Thomas, is there any better setup I can provide Stephen? Or > >> is the next-20200519 -rcu tree the best we have right now? > > > > I've queued the fixes yesterday into tip:locking/kcsan and tglx said > > something about you having to rebase anyway. I guess you can find him on > > IRC at some point later. :) > > locking/kcsan is not the problem (it just has more fixes on top) > > core/rcu is the one which diverged and caused the merge conflict with > PPC to happen twice. So Paul needs to remove the stale core/rcu bits and > rebase on the current version (which is not going to change again). So there will be another noinstr-rcu-* tag, and I will rebase on top of that, correct? If so, fair enough! Thanx, Paul
